It fails silently
The demo worked, so nobody built the failure path. Months later a webhook has been dropping records since an upstream schema change, and the first sign of it is a number that does not reconcile.
API integration and automation work connects the systems your business already runs: CRM, payments, analytics, publishing, and the internal tools in between. Gatilab builds the error handling and the logging first, because an integration that works on a good day and fails silently on a bad one is worse than no integration.
Delivery is remote, with calls in IST. You keep the code, the accounts, and every login in your own name.
Three failures account for most of what we get asked to rescue. All 3 are scoping problems wearing technical costumes.
The demo worked, so nobody built the failure path. Months later a webhook has been dropping records since an upstream schema change, and the first sign of it is a number that does not reconcile.
Logic spread across a low-code tool, a plugin, and a cron job is logic nobody can read. When the person who built it leaves, the business process leaves with them.
Without deciding which system owns which field, the CRM, the store, and the spreadsheet all disagree, and each team trusts the one that agrees with them.
Six pieces of work, each scoped on its own. Most engagements start with one and add the others once the first has paid for itself.
Leads, deals, and lifecycle data moving between your site and your CRM with deduplication and field mapping settled before anything is written.
Razorpay, Stripe, and gateway work including the parts that get skipped: webhooks, refunds, retries, and reconciliation against what actually settled.
Events defined against the real funnel, sent server-side where it matters, and landing somewhere you can query rather than only view.
Inventory, fulfilment, accounting, and support systems connected with a clear owner for each field and a sync direction that is written down.
The repetitive handoffs between systems automated, with the logic in one readable place instead of scattered across 3 tools.
Retries with backoff, dead-letter handling, structured logs, and alerts that reach a person. This is the part that decides whether the integration is trustworthy.
Prices are in rupees and exclude tax. The scoping sprint is a fixed fee and comes off the build price if you go ahead.
For teams who need a real number and a written plan before committing to a build.
The fee comes off the build price if you go ahead with us.
For a defined set of integrations with the failure paths built in.
If the work does not warrant a build, we quote the smaller fix instead.
For businesses whose integrations carry revenue and need watching.
Month to month. A contract you cannot leave is a hostage situation.
Development and consulting are delivered remotely, so location changes meeting times and payment method rather than price. Hosting is never resold.
Chosen because they stay maintainable for whoever comes after us, not because they are new. If your team already runs something else and it works, we work in it.
Overruns come from work nobody scoped. Every stage produces an artifact you check before the next one starts.
We read what already exists before quoting. Most of the risk in this kind of work is invisible from the outside, so pricing it without looking is a guess dressed as a number.
You leave with: a written scope with the assumptions and risks named
Work happens on an environment your team can reach, reviewed weekly. You see it grow rather than getting a reveal at the end and a week to react.
You leave with: a staging URL you can click through as it grows
Error handling, logging, and rollback are built with the feature, not after it. The question is never whether something fails, it is whether you find out before your customers do.
You leave with: monitoring, alerting, and a rollback path that has been tested
Documentation your next hire can read, every account in your name, and a dependency list short enough to maintain.
You leave with: documentation, credentials, and no lock-in
Vague quotes do the most damage in exactly this kind of work. Half of this list is reasons we say no.
Scope, cost, ownership, and the cases where we are the wrong choice.
Yes. Zapier and Make are genuinely the right tool for low-volume, low-consequence work. We move logic into code when volume, cost, or debuggability starts arguing for it, and we will tell you when it does not.
With a retainer, we track their changelogs and update before it breaks. Without one, the build still fails loudly rather than silently: structured logs, alerts, and dead-letter handling mean you find out from us or your dashboard, not from a reconciliation gap.
Webhooks as the source of truth, idempotency keys so a retry cannot double-charge, and a reconciliation check against what the gateway actually settled. Refunds and partial captures are scoped explicitly because they are where most integrations quietly diverge.
That page covers integrations inside WordPress specifically. This one covers connecting systems across your business, including cases where WordPress is not involved at all.
Send the current situation, what you have already tried, and the outcome you need. The more specific you are, the more specific the reply.
Prefer to talk first? Message us on WhatsApp. Budgets under ₹27,000 are better served elsewhere and we will say so rather than take the project.