Hosting and infrastructure work decides how a site behaves on its worst day, not its average one. Gatilab picks the platform against the workload, configures Cloudflare properly, and hands every account to you. We do not resell hosting, which is exactly why the recommendation is worth something.
Delivery is remote, with calls in IST. You keep the code, the accounts, and every login in your own name.
Three failures account for most of what we get asked to rescue. All 3 are scoping problems wearing technical costumes.
Agencies resell hosting because the margin is good and the lock-in is better. It is also why so many sites sit on a plan nobody would pick on merit, and why leaving the agency somehow means migrating the site.
Cloudflare in front of a site with default rules often caches the wrong things, misses the right ones, and silently breaks redirects or logged-in pages. The dashboard says protected while the cache hit rate says otherwise.
Uptime checks that ping the homepage miss the checkout being down. Without monitoring on the paths that carry money, the first alert is an email from a customer.
Six pieces of work, each scoped on its own. Most engagements start with one and add the others once the first has paid for itself.
A recommendation argued from your traffic, workload, and team, whether that lands on managed WordPress, Railway, Vercel, or a plain VPS. Written down with the tradeoffs.
Cache rules that actually cache, page rules that do not fight your redirects, WAF tuned to your traffic, and DNS that someone can read 6 months later.
Staging that matches production, deploys that can be rolled back, and preview environments so review happens before the change is live.
Checks on the paths that carry revenue, error tracking wired to a person, and alerts tuned so they still mean something after a month.
Backups you have actually restored from, with a documented recovery time. An untested backup is a belief, not a plan.
Moving hosts without the DNS-day drama: dry run, rehearsed cutover, redirects verified, and a rollback path if the new platform misbehaves.
Prices are in rupees and exclude tax. The scoping sprint is a fixed fee and comes off the build price if you go ahead.
For teams who need a real number and a written plan before committing to a build.
The fee comes off the build price if you go ahead with us.
For selecting the platform, configuring it properly, and moving you onto it.
If the work does not warrant a build, we quote the smaller fix instead.
For teams who want the platform watched rather than handed over.
Month to month. A contract you cannot leave is a hostage situation.
Development and consulting are delivered remotely, so location changes meeting times and payment method rather than price. Hosting is never resold.
Chosen because they stay maintainable for whoever comes after us, not because they are new. If your team already runs something else and it works, we work in it.
Overruns come from work nobody scoped. Every stage produces an artifact you check before the next one starts.
We read what already exists before quoting. Most of the risk in this kind of work is invisible from the outside, so pricing it without looking is a guess dressed as a number.
You leave with: a written scope with the assumptions and risks named
Work happens on an environment your team can reach, reviewed weekly. You see it grow rather than getting a reveal at the end and a week to react.
You leave with: a staging URL you can click through as it grows
Error handling, logging, and rollback are built with the feature, not after it. The question is never whether something fails, it is whether you find out before your customers do.
You leave with: monitoring, alerting, and a rollback path that has been tested
Documentation your next hire can read, every account in your name, and a dependency list short enough to maintain.
You leave with: documentation, credentials, and no lock-in
Vague quotes do the most damage in exactly this kind of work. Half of this list is reasons we say no.
Scope, cost, ownership, and the cases where we are the wrong choice.
No, deliberately, and it is the reason our recommendation is worth reading. Every account is created in your name and paid by you. Leaving us costs you a set of credentials and nothing else, which is how it should be.
It depends on the workload. Managed WordPress hosting for most content and commerce sites, Railway when the project needs long-running processes or its own database, Vercel for Next.js and Astro front ends, a plain VPS when the economics favour it. You get the reasoning, not just the answer.
Yes, and that is a common engagement on its own. Misconfigured cache rules, a blanket bypass that quietly disables caching, and page rules fighting redirects are the usual findings, and none of them require changing host.
That depends on the retainer you hold. Without one we work business hours, and we say so plainly rather than implying cover we do not provide. With one, the alerting routes to a named person and the runbook says what they do.
Send the current situation, what you have already tried, and the outcome you need. The more specific you are, the more specific the reply.
Prefer to talk first? Message us on WhatsApp. Budgets under ₹27,000 are better served elsewhere and we will say so rather than take the project.
